Written on September 13, 2011 – 2:08 am | by admin |

This is a web site devoted to the U.S. area plan and the return to the Moon. In some techniques, the foreseeable future is reminiscent of the moonshot days of the 1960s. The new rocket would have an Apollo-like capsule on top notch. Astronauts would to start with fly in that ship in 2015 but stay in Earth’s orbit, with a moon landing by 2020. Once there, astronauts would assemble a base camp and sooner or later journey to Mars. But, sadly, most of this AP report is relatively disparaging, it’s not a hatchet occupation, but it does paint NASA as old, fatigued, a bit missing in emphasis. Let us hope they’re erroneous. The only thing in this report that has me really apprehensive is this aspect about the recent and soon-to-be budget atmosphere:The two presidential nominees and quite a few in Congress say they want to continue to keep the shuttle flying earlier the 2010 retirement date mandated by the Bush administration. But undertaking so would be high-priced, and offered the present-day fiscal meltdown, big shelling out on NASA in the upcoming will not look probable. I am concerned about that as clearly as funding for the rest of the Moon, Mars and Outside of software. In previous week’s presidential discussion there was a telling minute when the moderator challenged the two candidates to clarify how the credit crisis would improve their priorities, and neither of them had an response. I am apprehensive that whoever wins in November, NASA could be part of that respond to..