Presidential Space Politics

Wired Science reports on fears that the next president, no matter who wins, may not fully fund or value the space program (Wired News - Presidential Candidates Too Quiet on Space Policy):

But a question that is of increasing concern among space scientists, engineers and supporters is what will the new president's space policy do? For many space voters there is a deep fear that the industry may face yet another deep re-evaluation of priorities, program "deferrals" or cancellations. In my 12 years in the work force I have seen little but that and there has been a huge cost financially, technically, and culturally that we are still bearing.

This report (in contrast to the previously mentioned report), contains one small quote from an actual candidate. Hey, we take what we can get.

Comments

[Darnell Clayton]

Perhaps its best that NASA get "slighted" in this regards.

Here's why: For the longest time, we (that being space enthusiasts) have been relying upon "daddy" NASA to get us to the stars.

Now that NASA has rediscovered its manhood, its being shafted by its employer (that would be the President plus Congress) so it can not provide for its space kids.

This will force NASA to look towards the NewSpace to help "fill the gap," which could ultimately lower costs for everyone.

I just hope NASA, SpaceX, Bigelow, etc. can pull it off with the limited time and funds that they have.

[Joel]

Darnell, I hope you are right and that one way or another they can make it work, and make it back to the Moon.