Written on September 13, 2011 – 2:08 am | by Admin |

This is a weblog devoted to the U.S. room application and the return to the Moon. In some methods, the long run is reminiscent of the moonshot days of the 1960s. The new rocket would have an Apollo-like capsule on best. Astronauts would initial fly in that ship in 2015 but stay in Earth’s orbit, with a moon landing by 2020. The moment there, astronauts would establish a base camp and finally journey to Mars. But, sadly, most of this AP report is rather disparaging, it is really not a hatchet job, but it does paint NASA as aged, tired, a bit missing in focus. Let’s hope they’re wrong. The only point in this report that has me definitely nervous is this element about the current and quickly-to-be funds surroundings:The two presidential nominees and a lot of in Congress say they want to hold the shuttle flying prior the 2010 retirement date mandated by the Bush administration. But undertaking so would be high-priced, and granted the current money meltdown, enormous investing on NASA in the upcoming will not seem to be most likely. I am concerned about that as perfectly as funding for the rest of the Moon, Mars and Beyond method. In last week’s presidential discussion there was a telling moment when the moderator challenged both candidates to make clear how the credit score crisis would improve their priorities, and neither of them had an reply. I’m worried that whoever wins in November, NASA could possibly be part of that reply..